or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments
High Court refuses to grant order for summary judgement and adjourns the matter to plenary hearing, on the grounds that: (a) the Plaintiff had failed to properly particularise their case; (b) the Plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case; (c) the Defendant had established a reasonable chance of a bona fide defence; and (d) the Defendant's case was supported by evidence and not mere assertion.
Summary judgement application - Plaintiff claims debt owed by Defendants by virtue of overdraft facility expiring - Defendants say the overdraft was extended and exhibit a letter stating such - Plaintiff demands sum owed by summary judgement - four criteria for granting a summary judgement - whether Plaintiff's claim sufficiently particularised and pleaded - whether Plaintiff has adduced sufficient evidence to establish prima facie case - whether there is a reasonable possibility of the Defendant having a bona fide defence - whether the Defendant's case is supported by evidence - case adjourned for plenary hearing.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.