High Court strikes off name of solicitor, who had been convicted and imprisoned for fraud, from Roll of Solicitors in order to maintain the reputation of the solicitors’ profession and to sustain public confidence in the integrity of that profession.
Solicitors – application to have solicitor struck off - Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal determined that he is not a fit person to be a member of the solicitors’ profession - forged documents purporting to be health insurance claims - claims were fictitious - he was being made redundant from his position with an insurance company and understood that it would pay him an appropriate redundancy payment to enable him to commence his own practice - redundancy payment did not materialise - engaged in the activities in question – monies long since been repaid – when confronted he admitted his conduct and undertook to repay the money outstanding – eventually pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment - private practice as a solicitor continued up to the time of his conviction and imprisonment – he has not resumed practice - has not come to the adverse notice of the Law Society or the gardaí - testimonials from former clients of his attested to his good conduct - Disciplinary Tribunal – argued that to strike him off the Roll of Solicitors would be unfair and disproportionate – accepted that some sanction must be imposed - factors which should be taken into account - Law Society contends that nothing less than a strike-off order is appropriate - in order to maintain the reputation of the solicitors’ profession and to sustain public confidence in the integrity of that profession his name must be struck from the Roll of Solicitors - purpose of this order is not punitive - sole purpose is to maintain the reputation of the solicitors’ profession.