Member Login

Decision of housing authority not to re-house applicant closer to hospital upheld

By: Ciaran Joyce BL

or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments

Court of Appeal dismisses appeal from High Court, and affirms refusal of judicial review of a decision of a housing authority to refuse to re-house the applicant in premises closer to a hospital and general practitioner's surgery, on the grounds that: (a) the management of the Council’s housing stock was a matter for the housing authorities concerned, and not for the courts; (b) no clear error in the decision-making process had been established by the disappointed applicant for re-housing; and (c) the trial judge had given adequate reasons for her decision.

Housing law – appeal of High Court refusal to quash a decision of a council refusing the applicants’ request to be re-housed in premises adapted to particular needs and situated within five miles of Cork University Hospital and their GP’s surgery – s. 20 of the Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2009 – whether the applicants an unfettered right to veto a rational choice made by the housing authority, or to choose accommodation – Article 25(b)(i) of the Assessment Regulations 2011 – section G of the Housing Scheme – Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – impermissible breach of the separation of powers – management of the Council’s housing stock is very much a matter for the housing authorities concerned in the first instance, and not for the courts – appeal dismissed

Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *