High Court grants orders allowing the continuation of an existing stay on works being carried out pursuant to a foreshore licence, on the grounds that the balance of justice lay in allowing the stay to continue in light of the risk of harm to the environment, that the case will almost certainly be moot if the interim stay is discharged, and that the court has fixed an early trial date.
Planning and development – judicial review – High Court granted an interim stay on works being carried out pursuant to a foreshore licence - application to continue the stay on an interlocutory basis - test for a stay - question of an arguable case or a fair question to be tried, the adequacy of damages and any undertaking in that regard, and the least risk to injustice as well as all other relevant circumstances – apply in the context of EU law and do not breach the principles of effectiveness or equivalence - applicants bear the onus of proof - arguability or fair question to be tried - adequacy of damages - least risk of injustice – public interest - climate emergency - matter of policy for the decision-maker in the absence of there being a specific justiciable standard – risk of harm to the environment -  need for renewable energy now doesn’t in itself create a basis to bypass the application of appropriate assessment and the right to an effective remedy through judicial review, particularly given how foreseeable such issues have been - Irish dependence on Russian energy -public interest in determining such issues at least in one case - fact that the Minister considered the possible impacts and that some mitigation measures were proposed does not automatically amount to an answer to the legal point made by the applicants - delay - case will almost certainly be moot if the interim stay is discharged – early trial date fixed – stay continued –